Analytic Theology and the Phenomenology of Faith
This article argues that analytic philosophy has a “convincingness deficit”; that proponents of the analytic method’s application to questions of theology must consider whether it is the best tool for the purpose at hand; and that phenomenology – in particular, Sartrean phenomenology – provides a useful methodological complement to the scholarly analysis of faith. After defining the convincingness deficit and what I take analytic theology to be, I defend phenomenology against the charge of “subjectivity” (voiced by Dennett and others) in order to argue that the varied ends of theological discourse require varied means – means which include phenomenology
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Date Deposited | 26 Jul 2024 21:08 |
Last Modified | 26 Jul 2024 21:08 |
Explore Further
Read more research from the creator(s):
Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):
Find other related resources: