Legal Personhood and the Firm: Avoiding Anthropomorphism and Equivocation

Gindis, David (2016) Legal Personhood and the Firm: Avoiding Anthropomorphism and Equivocation. pp. 499-513. ISSN 1744-1374
Copy

From the legal point of view, ‘person’ is not co-extensive with ‘human being’. Nor is it synonymous with ‘rational being’ or ‘responsible subject’. Much of the confusion surrounding the issue of the firm's legal personality is due to the tendency to address the matter with only these, all too often conflated, definitions of personhood in mind. On the contrary, when the term ‘person’ is defined in line with its original meaning as ‘mask’ worn in the legal drama, it is easy to see that it is only the capacity to attract legal relations that defines the legal person. This definition, that avoids the undesirable emotional associations and equivocations that often plague the debate, is important for a legally grounded view of the firm

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
Gindis_Accepted_Manuscript.pdf
Available under Creative Commons: 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation METS MODS RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer ASCII Citation
Export

Downloads